Definition and Scope
Technical definition: Ijma’ is the unanimous agreement of all mujtahidun (scholars capable of independent legal reasoning) of a given generation after the Prophet’s death on a legal ruling.
Key conditions for binding ijma’:
- Must involve ALL qualified mujtahidun — one dissenting opinion breaks ijma’
- Must be from a single generation (tabaqah) — not scattered across centuries
- Must be on a legal matter — ijma’ on historical facts or theological opinions functions differently
- Must occur after the Prophet’s death — during his lifetime, only his opinion mattered
Degrees of ijma’:
- Qat’i (certain) ijma’: Where dissent is unthinkable — e.g., the obligation of five prayers, the prohibition of alcohol. This is the universally recognized sense.
- Dhanni (probable) ijma’: Scholars claim consensus but some dissent may have been unrecorded. This is more contested.
Types of Ijma’
1. Ijma’ Sarih (explicit consensus): All scholars actually express their agreement — each one issues the same ruling 2. Ijma’ Sukuti (silent consensus): Some scholars rule one way; others remain silent; silence is taken as agreement
Ijma’ sukuti is weaker and contested — the Shafi’is generally reject it; the Hanafis accept it under conditions.
Relationship to Other Sources
The classical usul schema:
Quran (definitive) → Sunnah (clarifies and supplements) → Ijma’ (confirms and freezes the ruling) → Qiyas (extends to new cases)
Ijma’ has a unique “locking” function: once ijma’ is established on a ruling, that ruling can no longer be revisited by individual ijtihad. It becomes a fixed point in the law.
However, if a new generation of scholars produces new ijma’, the earlier ijma’ can in principle be revised — though scholars dispute whether this is really possible.
The Ismaili Position
In Ismaili jurisprudence, the authority of ijma’ is subordinated to the authority of the living Imam. Since the Imam has direct access to the Prophet’s batin knowledge, community consensus among scholars (who only have zahir knowledge) cannot override the Imam’s guidance. The Ismaili position thus differs fundamentally: the “infallibility” that Sunni scholars attribute to scholarly consensus is attributed in Ismaili theology to the Imam alone.
See also: Fiqh Overview, Fiqh Madhabs, Ijtihad, Qiyas, Isnad, Hadith Sciences, Dai Al Mutlaq Institution